Monday, 13 March 2017

Audio Ensemble rehearsal (Radio Play)

For our radio play, we were to perform the BBC play ‘People snogging in public places’; which follows 13-year-old self-diagnosed autistic James Matthews and his struggles with teenage life. James explains the different aspects of being a teenager in 1992 to the listener, and how his grandmother’s death acts as the catalyst for change in his household. Uncle Patrick is the predominant change in James’s life, so much so that James categorises his being into B.P and A.P (before Patrick and after Patrick). The play mostly focuses on the weekend where James is left with Patrick, as his mum, Angela, takes James’s older sister, Alice, on a shopping trip to reconnect with her as she has become distant since the arrival of Patrick. James’s school life takes a toll on him in addition to this, as his love for Lisa is proved to be unrequited after saying that she would ‘rather be ‘plonkered’ by a Great Dane with a shitty knob’ than sleep with him. Her boyfriend, Pete, collides with James’s apparent schedule.

We were to analyse a form of radio programme that involved dialogue and multiple characters; to ultimately set ourselves up for our radio performance. I listened to Mike Bartlett’s play, ‘Cock’, that first involves two gay men having relationship issues. Bartlett first came up with the idea for the play when teaching in the ‘gay’ side of Mexico City, commonly referred to as this, as Mexico have very religious connotations that consider homosexuality unnatural. Additionally, cockfighting is still a sport enjoyed by many in the region and involves two animals squaring up against one another, battling out to be victorious; and this aspect he has included in the dialogue as both John and his nameless boyfriend are wanting to come out successful in their first argument that opens the play.
Bartlett says before he writes a play, that he simply starts out writing a conversation between two people that have some sort of relationship with each other, and goes from there. I think this is evident in the radio performance of ‘Cock’, as it contains mass amounts of rapid dialogue and the topic of conversation at most points can be related to a simple subject or what problem person ‘A’ has with person ‘B’; in this case, it is John (read by Ben Whishaw) that has the issue with his boyfriend (read by Andrew Scott). However, as time goes on, a person ‘C’ is introduced into the equation as it is revealed that John is having an ‘affair’ with a girl (read by Katherine Parkinson), who also remains nameless.

The slight anonymity of John’s sexual partners makes it obvious that Bartlett had meant for this to be the case when writing the play; personally, I think that he has done this to imagine ourselves in John’s position and observe the relationships he has with Scott’s and Parkinson’s characters. It may also reflect his personality disorder and his confession that he is two different people when he is with his two sexual partners, and when caught in the middle he did not know how to act. This can relate to James from our radio play as he too is confused and would not know how to react in certain ‘everyday’ situations; his relationship with Pete as an example. The major difference, however, is that James acts as the narrator in ‘PSIPP’ while John acts as the protagonist; hence, we as the audience get a sense of confidence from James as he acknowledges his apparent place in the social hierarchy, whereas John is perplexed with not just everyone around him, but himself too.

The overall quality of ‘Cock’ was sublime, as the script was eligible to double-up as a theatre play as well as a radio play, and I think this is evidence of its distinction. Minimal sound effects are prominent in the programme, due to the script making obvious references to ones that had occurred; for example, when John and his boyfriend are in their apartment, ‘M’ (Andrew Scott) points out that there was a knock on the door and that on the other side of it was Katherine Parkinson’s character. Another example is when she punches ‘M’’s dad (voiced by Paul Jesson – ‘F’) just after dinner, where any sound is unnecessary due to remarkable reactions from characters.

Subsequently, ‘Cock’ has constant strong language and sexual content that would make it inappropriate for children; however, its dramatic brilliance would make it very suitable for a BBC programme if it were a picture drama as it already licensed to BBC Radio 3. It created the right atmosphere for its themes (sexuality, confrontation etc.) and built up the story with the right amount of pace, as it splits itself into three stages: John’s time with his boyfriend and how unsettled he becomes with their relationship, his discovery of ‘W’ and his intimate time with her and then finally the choice between the two.

During the build-up to my group’s performance of ‘People Snogging in Public Places’, I rehearsed my three assigned roles; ‘Teacher 1’, ‘Operator’ and ‘Man’. Obviously due to lack of radio air time and multi roles, I practised a variety of accents and vocal methods to differentiate my characters as much as possible and to provide a big contrast between them. For my Teacher line, I start a worsening chain of embarrassing questions asked by teachers to James; going from ‘Did he hit you?’ to ‘Did he apply strawberry lipstick to your lips and make you sing patty-cake patty-cake patty-cake?’. So, I thought a concerned low-pitch and authoritative voice would do the trick as the questions get considerably less serious as they go on.

Next, my only multi-liner character, the Operator, would have a well-spoken, monotone sound to their voice based on what most telephone workers are like in my experience in talking to them. Not only is a day at work dull for Operators, but you’d also have the occasional person ringing up for a laugh – so I’d imagine they’d be quite underwhelming and so I wanted to create a caricature of this idea. This would be so my character would pretend as if they are enthusiastic, but instead are doing an underwhelming job in doing so; this would create a comedic aspect to the role, however, it may take away the tone away from the scene after where James connects to Pete’s dad.

Finally, the ‘Man’ role involved James bumping into my character as he runs down the street to the park to find Uncle Patrick. Therefore, my line ‘Oi, you little prick!’ had to be aggressive; so, I succumbed to stereotype and played the role with a cockney accent. This put more emphasis on the ‘Oi!’ and gave it the urgency I felt it needed. Our substitute teacher, Nadine, complimented me on my vocal diversity and my choice of accent. In our lesson with Nadine, we experimented with recording noises around the room, and bringing them back to see what everyday things they could be. For example, I pinged a metal pillar in the class and recorded it, then feedback suggested it could be the noise of train gates or a school bell. Then, Pau recorded the closing of the class door and it was said that it could act as thunder. This workshop was to suggest that radio performances can be low-budget productions as not everything ids taken literally in terms of sound.


During the recording process, our loudest and quietest lines had to be performed in various distances towards the microphone to get the best quality from it. For instance, when I speak as the operator, I ensure that I speak a bit closer to the microphone as an operator would usually have a headset on, thus be very close to their speaking instrument. Contrasting to this, my ‘Oi, you little prick!’ line toward the end of the play would have to be greatly projected away from the mic, with my back turned. This was for quality and to ensure there was no damage done to the recording equipment.

Saturday, 28 January 2017

Prop Making (pre-editing)

For our prop-making module, I was assigned to make the book for our children's theatre production of William Shakespeare's 'A Midsummer Night's Dream'. For this, I studied various book used in pantomimes and shows to draw inspiration from; however, I did already have a vague idea in mind for the design. Nevertheless, I continued my search for a range of on stage books and found myself struggling as resources showed different complex designs that I had no hope replicating in the time frame we are given for the module. Some of them are as follows:









As they are both used as part of the stage rather than a prop on stage, I was unable to draw any inspiration from that so I moved on to my own interpretations of what the book should look like; provoking my initial design ideas to be put into motion. This entailed using recycled toilet paper tubes as the spine of the book, then the paper being wedged into the middle as the pages for the book. However, when putting this into practise, it proved tricky as the tubes were tougher than first thought so it was perplex when approaching with a saw due to its awkward shape and position on the workbench. I got through it however, with Pete's assistance, and moved on to making the front and back of the book.
It was best, I thought, to make them out of wood to avoid any problems with the strength of the book during performance. Therefore, I found two similar size pieces of wood and sanded them both down to rid of any sharp corner or splinter and made them approximately 60 centimetres in length and 35 in width. This I thought an appropriate size as it was big enough for the character Shakespeare to handle on-stage, yet not too heavy to have a negative impact during performance.

In addition, I unwittingly stumbled upon a picture of a stage book similar to my design ideas and so it inspired me to develop them as I had more of a structured idea of how I was going to design the book.